LHE-7300 v1

Brenner, H. (2018). A Title IX conundrum: Are campus visitors protected from sexual assault? Iowa Law Review, 104(1), 93–138.
Sexual violence is a significant problem on college campuses that has been made visible by media attention to the MeToo movement. Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 addresses discrimination (including sexual violence). The author examines if Title IX applies to campus visitors.

Stader, D. L., & Williams-Cunningham, J. L. (2017). Campus sexual assault, institutional betrayal, and Title IX. Clearing House, 90(5/6), 198–202.
The author contends that institutional betrayal of college student sexual assault victims presents a serious problem. Victims of institutional betrayal often suffers similar physical and sexual health problems as victims of interpersonal betrayal.

Films Media Group. (2015). Courts, not campuses, should decide sexual assault cases: A debate . Films on Demand.
This film provides both a pro and con discussion to whether cases involving sexual assault should be decided by the courts, rather than higher education institutions. The discussion is in the form of a debate, with a moderator and panel members, taking either the side for the courts or the higher education institution in making decisions on sexual assault cases. One area of the debate centers on the importance of procedural due process.

White, K. B. (2019). Disciplining fairness: The role of public perception in disciplining campus sexual assault. Denver Law Review, 97(1), 293–326.
The author of this law review article provides a critical analysis of recent efforts to erode Title IX in higher education by using the media as a platform. Read pages 293-326.

Films Media Group. (1997). Evening the odds: Is Title IX working? [Film]. Films on Demand.

Kaufer Busch, E. (2018). Sexual assault: What’s Title IX got to do with it? Perspectives on Political Science, 47(2), 104–114.
The author provides background information on Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972, including the statutory meaning and its current applicability to higher education. In another part of the article, a list of specific procedures for higher education institutions in sexual harrassment claims is provided.

Davis, H. (2020). Symbolism over substance: The role of adversarial cross-examination in campus sexual assault adjudications and the legality of the proposed rulemaking on Title IX. Michigan Journal of Gender & Law, 27(1), 213–245.
The author in this law review article discusses the proposed rulemaking on Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972, by mandating cross-examination in all campus sexual assault cases at both public and private universities.

Cyphert, A. B. (2018). The devil is in the details: Exploring restorative justice as an option for campus sexual assault responses under Title IX. Denver Law Review, 96(1), 51–85.
The author is of the opinion that as in so many promising programs, the devil is in the details here [Title IX], and any collegiate restorative justice program that addresses sexual violence must be properly designed and properly facilitated. To make it available as a meaningful option for survivors, we must offer some protection to the accused student.

Turner, K. (2017). The rights of school employee-coaches under Title VII and Title IX in educational athletic programs. ABA Journal of Labor & Employment Law, 32(2), 229–253.
Author explores under what circumstances school employees, particularly coaches, have the right, under Title VII and/or Title IX, to address sex discrimination and retaliation within educational programming at the post-secondary levels. Specifically, in the athletics context, how do coaches, whether also teachers, directors, or professors, who are subjected to either discrimination, retaliation, or both, evaluate and vindicate their rights?

Goldman, R. A. (2019). When is due process due?: The impact of title ix sexual assault adjudication on the rights of university students. Pepperdine Law Review, 47(1), 185.
The author of this law review article contends that, “[Title IX] has ballooned tremendously over the years to include a variety of conduct occurring on college campuses” (p. 185). Solutions and suggestions for approving the adjudication system on campuses in order to protect the rights of both the victims and accused students.